Client names are withheld for confidentiality. The results are not vague: each case study states the tracked period, starting point, ending point, source and limitations. No invented testimonials and no claim that SEO caused revenue we cannot attribute.
Both projects involve international wholesale e-commerce. One started with very little tracked visibility. The other already ranked well and needed to turn a strong base into category leadership.
An international wholesale jewelry store grew tracked visibility from 2.31% to 32.36%. The monitored keyword set finished with 99 position-one rankings and 150 keywords in the top 10.
→ Read the ecommerce SEO growth case studyA global wholesale supplier increased tracked visibility from 22.14% to 63.37%. By the end of the export, 66 of 116 monitored keywords ranked in position one.
→ Read the international B2B SEO case studyRank-tracking data shows movement in a defined keyword set. Third-party traffic estimates show market visibility, not exact analytics. Revenue is only included when client analytics supports it, and it is never presented as proof that SEO alone created every sale.
Every ranking comparison uses the first and last dates in the supplied export. We do not hide the timeframe behind “recent growth.”
Position Tracking, Domain Overview and GA4 are labelled so you can distinguish monitored rankings, modeled estimates and first-party commerce data.
Revenue can support commercial context. Without channel-level attribution and a controlled counterfactual, it does not prove that SEO created the full amount.
Client domains stay private, while business model, market, starting position, results and measurement limitations stay visible.
